Does the statement, "The overuse of technology tends to hinder beginner players less than advanced players" hold true?

The statement "The overuse of technology tends to hinder beginner players less than advanced players" is best understood within the context of how players at different skill levels interact with technology. Advanced players typically have a more developed understanding of their game and can identify how technology may be altering their play, for better or worse. Consequently, they might experience a greater potential for confusion or dependency on technology, which can interfere with their natural skills and instincts.

On the other hand, beginner players are still in the early stages of learning fundamental skills and techniques. They may benefit from the guidance technology provides, such as swing analysis tools or instructional apps, without having developed any pre-existing habits or concepts that could be detrimental. Thus, they may find technological aids to be more helpful rather than hindering.

An additional layer is that advanced players often must balance their reliance on technology with the need to maintain certain natural capabilities, which can lead to frustration if they find themselves over-relying on tech instead of their own skills. Therefore, it stands to reason that the assertion about technology hindering players differently across skill levels is more accurate for advanced players compared to beginners.