Revising training requirements is considered what type of response to negative variances?

Revising training requirements as a response to negative variances is considered an effective response because it directly addresses the gap between performance expectations and actual outcomes. When negative variances are identified—meaning results are not meeting the established standards—adjusting the training programs can help enhance the skills and knowledge of the individuals involved. This proactive approach ensures that the workforce is better prepared to meet performance goals moving forward. By strengthening the training, the organization can resolve the issues contributing to the negative variance, making it a constructive and strategic way to improve overall performance.

On the other hand, other types of responses, such as counterproductive, unnecessary, or delayed responses, may not necessarily contribute positively to resolving the issues at hand and could further exacerbate the situation.